Please feel free to add your advice or questions in the comments below. Begin with a restatement of your research question, followed by a statement about whether or not, and how much, your findings "answer" the question. Likewise a historian may break the thesis up into time periods and do critique and evaluation throughout the whole.
Use each of these points as a prompt to write a short paragraph on why. In fact, the precision of tonotopic organization in A1 has been a controversial issue for a few decades and remains unresolved to date9, 34, 35, 36, The conclusion, on the other hand, is generally brief and provides just the main points of your dissertation; i.
Every thesis needs to have discussion like elements, but they may do it in different ways. Wendy sat in a chair and just talked at me. Our data, however, put additional constraints on this connectivity model.
These should be the first two pieces of information the reader encounters. Write to try and work out what you think and then re-write it later.
Our main finding consists of highly heterogeneous local populations with relatively large correlations between a minority of neighboring neurons.
You might also want to revisit your introduction section at this point and put more emphasis on studies that have proven relevant for the interpretation of your results. These externalities are of primary interest to our discussion.
How similar or variable are the response properties of neighboring neurons in A1? Finally, our data describing strong correlation between noise correlation during on-going activity and during auditory stimuli support the idea that distributed groups of interconnected neurons are coactivated during tone stimulation.
After about another 45 minutes of fiddling and arguing about it, we had this provisional list of four themes: Such a model would result in the formation of small subnetworks of highly correlated neurons, partially overlapping in space.
Or your choice of methodology? In a conventional thesis, what we call the IMRAD type introduction, methods, results, discussion and conclusion the discussion chapter appears a discrete chapter. Your discussion section allows you to take a fresh perspective on your findings, so you can dig deep and provide new and original ideas from your research.
These two terms usually represent two separate concepts. Think beyond replicating your study and overcoming your limitations. Sometimes, like the null hypothesis, talking about the limitations can help you better define the contribution your study has made.
Provide one or two recommendations for future research or follow-up studies.
I wrote what she said on the whiteboard, asking a question now and then to clarify or expand on a point. What other issues and questions arise? How would the machine work?How to write a Discussion chapter for your thesis or dissertation I noticed that the Discussion chapter is one of the hardest to write, especially when you are.
Things to Avoid When Writing the Discussion Overinterpretation of the Results Unwarranted Speculation Inflating the Importance of the Findings Tangential Issues The “Bully Pulpit” Conclusions That Are Not Supported by the Data Summary Explaining the meaning of the results to the reader is the purpose of the discussion section of a research paper.
The discussion section is a very important part of your dissertation or research paper. It is also one of the most difficult parts to write, and sometimes the longest. Yet, many students write. When writing a dissertation or thesis, the results and discussion sections can be both the most interesting as well as the most challenging sections to write.
You may choose to write these sections separately, or combine them into a single chapter, depending on your university’s guidelines and your own preferences. Indeed, every discussion should include a "humility" section that addresses the study's limitations, write Cone and Foster.
But avoid beginning the discussion with a. The discussion chapter is the problem child of the thesis.
The chapter most likely to provoke fear, uncertainty and doubt. Not everyone writes a chapter called "discussion", but everyone has to do discussiony bits because, well - that's where the creative magic of the PhD happens.Download