Fundamentally a truly outstanding movie, it is a must-see for anyone who considers themself a film buff and can handle graphic subject matter. Its hodgepodge of violence, mayhem, and generally deviant behavior is an assault on the senses, not to mention political correctness.
It has loyalty among low lifes, and many other odd characters that are all bad and not one is a villain or hero.
Also, the acting is always something to behold as by turns straightforward, over the top, subtle, and just downright menacing and spot-on. Was this review helpful?
Sign in to vote. Martin Landau, the best supporting actor winner that year, was terrific and funny in Ed Wood, but Jackson was perhaps the most commanding Marxist review of pulp fiction presence in film history as the bible-quoting, godfearing hitman.
But I am so impressed that I feel compelled to add a few specific observations to the many fine reviews already on this database.
And somehow even after years of parody and terrible rip-offs, it holds its own and- as one can say after seeing it at a midnight screening- holds its audience as much as it had the countless times before they saw it or if they are, the first time.
Irrespective of audience sensibilities, however, the film-makers, supported by superb acting in every role, manage to create a world full of the most fascinating sleazy characters possibly ever to appear on screen.
Rumors of a prequel involving Jules and Vincent John Travolta have been floating around lately. If Quentin Tarantino wishes to regain the fans he lost with the dissapointing but still pretty good Jackie Brown, he should get to work right away. Gatorman9 18 April I just finished screening this movie for the first time after putting it off for a number of years because of what seemed like equivocating appraisals from some of my friends.
And writing, already noted, has been copied by many, and only equaled by a select few. As in that film made way back inand as another reviewer has suggested, perhaps its special appeal - its unusually high degree of emotional impact - lies in its distinctly successful simultaneous application of several different genres in a single film - drama, action, dark humor - with the whole thing bound together by essentially flawless execution in every department.
As at least one other reviewer noted, when the film ends you are actually disappointed, left craving more of these crazy people and their explosive lives. The fact that he was denied an Oscar is a downright shame. It also gets better with each viewing, especially if one of those happens to be on a big theatrical screen where all of the BIG compositions get bigger and more detailed.
How much else is there to talk about it after all these years?Tarantino's masterpiece. Entertaining, yet violent. Read Common Sense Media's Pulp Fiction review, age rating, and parents guide.
Sep 23, · EVER since Quentin Tarantino's "Pulp Fiction" created a sensation at this year's Cannes Film Festival, where it won top honors (the Palme d'Or), it has been swathed in the wildest hyperbole. In. Oct 14, · His new movie "Pulp Fiction" is a comedy about blood, guts, violence, strange sex, drugs, fixed fights, dead body disposal, leather freaks, and a wristwatch that makes a dark journey down through the generations.4/4.
Pulp Fiction is an American crime film written and directed by Quentin Tarantino that connects the intersecting storylines of gangsters. Pulp Fiction review – Tarantino's mesmeric thriller still breathtaking 20 years on 5 / 5 stars 5 out of 5 stars.
The dialogue, the soundtrack, the sheer directionless excitement –. Critic Consensus: One of the most influential films of the s, Pulp Fiction is a delirious post-modern mix of neo-noir thrills, pitch-black humor, and pop-culture touchstones%.Download